Latest Threads

Forum Statistics
  • Forum posts:523
  • Forum threads:264
  • Members:123
  • Latest member:CashLoansgom

  COVID-19 Testing Scandal Deepens

Posted by: Lordy x2
12-20-2020, 09:18 AM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- Replies (1)

COVID-19 Testing Scandal Deepens 
Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical if not outright criminal. PCR tests cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. They also cannot confirm that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens

The tests have exceptionally high false result rates. The higher the cycle threshold (CT) — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — the greater the chance of a false positive. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero Florida recently became the first state to require all labs in the state to report the CT used for their PCR tests

The SARS-CoV-2 PCR test was developed based on a genetic sequence published by Chinese scientists, not the viral isolate. Missing genetic code was simply made up 

Here's Why PCR Tests Are the Wrong Tool to Assess Pandemic Threat 

We now know that PCR tests: 
1. Cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool — For this reason, it is grossly misleading to refer to a positive test as a “COVID-19 case.” As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness1 lecture, featured in “How Medical Technocracy Made the pandemic Possible,” media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated “cases” or positive tests with the actual illness.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/artic...cracy.aspx

Medically speaking, a “case” refers to a sick person. It never ever referred to someone who had no symptoms of illness. Now all of a sudden, this well-established medical term, “case,” has been arbitrarily redefined to mean someone who tested positive for the presence of noninfectious viral RNA. As noted by Merritt, “That is not epidemiology. That’s fraud.” 

2. Cannot confirm that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens. 

3. Have not been established for monitoring the treatment of 2019-nCoV infection. 

4. Have exceptionally high false result rates — The higher the cycle threshold (CT) — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — the greater the chance of a false positive. While any CT over 35 is deemed scientifically unjustifiable, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend running PCR tests at a CT of 40.5 Drosten tests and tests recommended by the World Health Organization are set to a CT of 45. These excessively high CTs guarantee the appearance of widespread (pandemic) infection when infection rates are in fact low.

Expose the Fraud, End the Misery 
A number of experts have now come forward, calling out the COVID-19 pandemic as a cruel hoax perpetuated by fatally flawed testing. Aside from this testing data, there’s no evidence of a lethal pandemic at all. While there is such a thing as COVID-19, and people have and do die from it, there are no excess deaths due to it. In other words, the total mortality for 2020 is normal. The pandemic has not killed more people than would die in any given year — from something, anything — anyway.

So, unless we think we should shut down the world and stop living because people die from heart disease, diabetes, cancer, the flu or anything else, then there’s no reason to shut down the world because some people happen to die from COVID-19. The good news is the hoax is starting to be exposed, and will continue to be exposed as more cases are brought before the courts of the world. Fuellmich and his ACU legal team are leading that charge. As for what you can do in the meantime, consider:

• Turning off mainstream media news and turning to independent experts — Do the research. Read through the science.

• Continue to counter the censorship by asking questions — The more questions are asked, the more answers will come to light. Arm yourself with mortality statistics and the facts on PCR testing, so you can explain how and why this pandemic simply isn’t a pandemic anymore.

• If you are a medical professional, especially if you’re a member of a professional society, write an open letter to your government, urging them to speak to and heed recommendations from independent experts.

• Sign The Great Barrington Declaration,which calls for an end to lockdowns.

 https://gbdeclaration.org/?_sm_au_=iVVGs...tvKtpMGMvF https://articles.mercola.com/sites/artic...ility.aspx

Print this item

Video Worth Watching

Posted by: Lordy x2
12-16-2020, 08:00 PM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- No Replies

If you want to know the difference between what you are told is going on and what is really going on this video is worth watching.

COVID ASYMPTOMATIC ILLUSION, DANGERS OF PATHOGENIC PRIMING & MSM PUSH FOR VACCINE PASSPORTS


Popcorn Popcorn

Print this item

  France Approves New Cryptocurrency Measures to Fight Anonymous Transactions

Posted by: Danielrig
12-15-2020, 06:05 PM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- No Replies

France Approves New Cryptocurrency Measures to Fight Anonymous Transactions
The French council of ministers has approved a series of new measures to combat the anonymity of cryptocurrency transactions. Anonymous accounts are banned at crypto exchanges which must now impose stricter know-your-customer requirements. France’s Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire says the changes are necessary to fight against terrorism financing.
France Tightens Crypto Surveillance

France’s Council of Ministers endorsed an ordinance containing a series of measures to tighten the surveillance of cryptocurrency activities last week. The ordinance, which will enter into force in six months, was submitted by the French Minister of Finance, Bruno Le Maire, along with ministers Sebastien Lecornu and Olivier Dussopt.

La Maire tweeted Wednesday: “We must dry up all the terrorist financing circuits for the smallest euro … we presented to the Council of Ministers this morning an order making it possible to strengthen the fight against the anonymity of crypto-asset transactions.” According to the press release issued by the three ministers:

This ordinance strengthens the fight against the anonymity of transactions in digital assets by including digital asset service providers … among the entities having the ban on keeping anonymous accounts.

The ordinance’s measures will be specified in the upcoming decrees to be released this week, according to local media. All French cryptocurrency exchanges will be required to equip themselves with a more rigorous know-your-customer (KYC) system.

Crypto exchanges will have to request two proofs of identity from their customers from the first euro spent, instead of the previous 1,000 euro minimum limit. The ID requirements will be a SEPA transfer accompanied by an identity document. In addition, all exchanges, including those that do not offer fiat trading pairs, will need to register with an administrative body, likely the Autorite des marches financiers (AMF), France’s financial markets regulator.

However, the new requirements raise concerns that non-European customers will be unable to register on French cryptocurrency exchanges because they do not have a European bank account, thus depriving French startups of participating in the global crypto market.

“We are aware that this reinforced identification penalizes companies,” a ministerial source was quoted by the Capital publication as saying. She added that “The decree will therefore come into force in the spring” so companies have several months to comply.

What do you think about France’s new crypto measures? Let us know in the comments section below.
Source: cryptocurrency news.

Print this item

Banana More of the Sane

Posted by: Lordy x2
12-15-2020, 02:55 PM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- No Replies

Print this item

skull Forcing untested lethal mRNA vaccine on public violates the Nuremburg Trials

Posted by: Lordy x2
12-10-2020, 02:11 AM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- No Replies


Dr. Francis Boyle joins The Alex Jones Show to expose how forcing the untested lethal mRNA vaccine on the public violates the Nuremburg Trials ruling against Nazi medical experimentation cruelty.

Print this item

  people have a very short memory

Posted by: Lordy x2
12-05-2020, 04:24 AM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- Replies (1)

SARS:
Is it Real? Or is it a Hoax?
Lorraine Day, M.D.

(Posted June 27, 2003 -- They were running the same scam well before Covid-19)

Is SARS a real entity? Everyone accepts it as true, but NO ONE is asking the right questions. In fact, NO ONE is asking ANY questions!

Let's start from the beginning.

1) What does the acronym SARS stand for?
Answer: Severe, Acute, Respiratory Syndrome.

2) But what does that really mean?
Answer: Almost nothing!

Severe
the definition is obvious. It's the opposite of mild. However, this, in fact, does NOT describe the "disorder" accurately.
Acute
means rapid onset as opposed to a chronic disease, such as arthritis
Respiratory
having to do with the respiratory system.
Syndrome
defined in Taber's Medical Dictionary as the following:
"A group of symptoms and signs of disordered function related to one another by means of some anatomic, physiologic, or biochemical peculiarity. This definition does NOT include a precise cause of an illness but does provide a framework of reference for investigating it."

The name really means nothing. "Severe, Acute, Respiratory Syndrome" is a catch-all term that can be applied to numerous disorders, particularly plain, old pneumonia!

2) How can SARS be identified?
A) By its symptoms? A great big, "NO!"

In the headline article of the May 9, 2003 Desert Sun (the only newspaper in the Palm Springs area. It is owned and operated by Gannett, the owners of USA Today), the symptoms of SARS, according to the Centers for Disease Control, are specifically defined as the following:
[quote2]
1) A fever greater than 100.4 degrees. So what! Every doctor knows that a perfectly healthy person can generate that much increased temperature on a moderately hot day. That "fever" is less than 2 degrees above Normal. It is NO "fever" at all!

2) Headache - Big deal! Everyone has a headache now and then. That
can be caused by stress, fatigue, caffeine withdrawal, mild hunger,
a minor cold, the flu and many, many other mild conditions.

3) Body aches - again, so what! That's a totally generic symptom that can occur in anyone at any time. It means NOTHING in this situation!

4) MILD respiratory symptoms. You can have that with a cold, flu, bronchitis, allergies, asthma or even from the effects of a smoggy day. This is not specific enough to identify ANYTHING!

5) Difficulty breathing. This can be associated with all of the conditions mentioned in #4.


[/quote]
These "symptoms" are so generic as to be laughable. Yet these are the symptoms of "SARS" as published by The Centers for Disease Control (CDC). They ought to be ashamed!

These are the symptoms of a mild cold, the flu, bronchitis, allergies, asthma, or any "garden-variety" pneumonia. They are in NO way specific for ANY special disorder!

It is very important to note that this "disorder" is described as a "syndrome" rather than a disease, because this diagnosis is just a "guess." The name tells us nothing. It is a generic name, a name that describes symptoms that could fit any one of forty or more conditions or disorders. It describes anything - - - and nothing!

It is medically IMPOSSIBLE, and totally UNJUSTIFIABLE to state that these run-of-the-mill symptoms, common to a cold, the flu, allergies, asthma, or dozens of other mild medical problems, can be used to designate a "disorder" or "syndrome" that is being described as a "global epidemic," a cause for "panic," or a disorder that can be used to quarantine or isolate individuals, groups, cities or even entire countries!

This is a TOTAL FRAUD!

So, we have most certainly established that a doctor CANNOT specify that a person has SARS by evaluation of their symptoms. ALL the symptoms are completely NON-SPECIFIC.
B) Can you Identify SARS by culturing a specific organism (bacteria or virus)
from the patient?
[quote2]
1) The government says they have isolated the virus that causes SARS.

How AMAZING that researchers were able to do that within a few weeks of the time SARS first appeared, especially when it took almost EIGHT YEARS for researchers to isolate the AIDS virus!

How AMAZING that they were able to isolate the "SARS" virus even though they can't even distinguish SARS, based on the symptoms, from plain old, "garden-variety" pneumonia! How do they know that the "SARS" virus comes from a patient with "SARS," if they can't distinguish "SARS"from any other pneumonia, or many other generic conditions, by its symptoms?

2) The government says that the virus that causes SARS is a member of the family of Coronaviruses.

The truth is that Coronaviruses cause many, many conditions, including colds, the flu, pneumonia and other respiratory infections of ALL varieties. They are common viruses and not specific for ANYTHING.

How can ANYONE say that a Coronavirus is the cause of SARS when the National Post has published that Canada's "top virus hunter, Francis Plummer, a veteran scientist who has spent 20 years tracking AIDS and other deadly infections around the globe, said he is not convinced by the theory that SARS is caused by a rogue strain of coronavirus. Dr. Plummer said tests show only 40% of Canadian SARS patients have the suspect virus in their tissue samples and even these patients have small amounts of it. Moreover, some people who test positive for coronavirus have no SARS symptoms."

"The link between SARS and the virus is quite weak," said Dr. Plummer, scientific director of the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg.

The very fact that less than half of the patients with supposed "SARS" have evidence of the Coronavirus, leaves MAJOR questions about the Coronavirus being the etiological factor for SARS.

What is causing "SARS" in the other 60% of patients?

Why do some people test positive for the "SARS" virus, but have no
symptoms?

To suggest that a Coronavirus is the cause of a supposed disorder generically named "SARS" based on such flimsy "evidence" is very BAD science, at best, and deliberate fraud at the worst!

3) Even if "SARS" were a REAL disease, and even if a "rogue" Coronavirus were the cause of "SARS," the BBC News has published that "the virus thought to cause SARS is CONSTANTLY CHANGING FORM." If that is true, then how can ANYONE know WHAT virus is actually causing the supposed disease, since the virus would mutate to another form before any researcher could establish that a specific form of the virus was the cause of any specific disease?

Notice that the Beijing Genomics Institute reported that the virus is "EXPECTED to mutate very fast and very easily." WHY is it "EXPECTED" to do this? That means it hasn't done that yet, so WHO is EXPECTING it to mutate "very fast and very easily?" - - and on what basis? Could this be a genetically modified form of the Coronavirus, designed in a U.S. laboratory to do just exactly what is predicted?

The article goes on to state that:

"So far, the strain has killed more than 200 people, mainly in China, Hong Kong, Canada and Singapore."

Let's see, the combined populations of China, Hong Kong, Canada and Singapore, must be around 2 BILLION people. To suggest that the death of 200 people, out of a total population of 2 BILLION - over a period of several months - from ANY type of disease, can be characterized as an "epidemic" is absurd!

You can be sure that at least 50 times that many people in that combined area, die from plain old, "garden-variety" pneumonia and other generic respiratory illnesses in half that time!

Every life is important, but statistically speaking, 200 deaths, even in ONE day, out of a population of 2 billion, is not unusual. It has no impact on ANYTHING! It means NOTHING! In NO WAY does it suggest an "epidemic" of ANYTHING! This is nothing but deliberate "Scare Tactics!"

And speaking of "mutation," an article published by the CBS News Online staff, on June 19, 2003, says that "SARS Experts in Canada are "concerned" that the "SARS" virus will be mutating to a "MILDER" form that will not kill the victim, it will cause only a mild disease so that people can go about their daily work - - and transmit it to a large number of others. . . The mutation would also make developing an effective treatment much harder." (Please note: If it's a MILD disease, who needs an "effective" treatment? The body will take care of it, as it does the common cold). Dr. Donald Low, head of microbiology at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto said, that in that case, "different SARS vaccines would have to be manufactured every year or two."

Now wouldn't THAT be a financial BONANZA for the pharmaceutical companies!

4) Whenever the media headlines contain the words, "Panicked," "EXPLOSIVE Epidemic," "Outbreak INEVITABLE," "First Global Epidemic," "SARS Here To Stay," "Unstoppable," "Mystifying," "Terrifying," these are PROPAGANDA words designed specifically to produce TERROR in the hearts and minds of the citizens! These are the exact headline words that have been used to describe the supposed SARS "epidemic."

One headline announced, "US Hospitals Brace for SARS As Cases Inch Up." If cases are only "Inching Up," NO hospital has to BRACE ITSELF. This is Orwellian NewSpeak! - language designed to deliberately instill fear.

Would you "Brace yourself" for a tortoise coming towards you from 500 yards away? Or even a Tiger, if it was only "inching" towards you? Of course not! You would just turn and walk away.


[/quote]
This is propaganda at its worst!

To Summarize So Far:

The supposed disorder of "SARS":

A. CANNOT be distinguished, by its symptoms, from virtually ANY other mild or severe respiratory disorder!

B. CANNOT be distinguished by any specific microorganism (virus or bacteria)!

And just recently, the World Health Organization has demanded that Public Health organizations "EXPAND" the definition of SARS to include ANY patient with a "pulmonary infiltrate."

A "pulmonary infiltrate" is a non-specific term for the infiltration of a localized or generalized area of lung tissue by cells or fluid, not normally present in the lung, causing a dense area on chest X-ray. A few of the many conditions that can present with a pulmonary infiltrate are:

A. Asthma
B. Allergic disorders - of many different kinds
C. Parasitic disorders - of many different kinds
D. Collagen vascular disorders, such as Wegener's granulomatosis and Rheumatoid lung disease
E. Sarcoidosis
F. Fungal infections of the lung - of which there are many
G. Lung Cancer - of several different types
H. Lung metastases from cancer, with the primary tumor in another organ
I. Lymphoma
J. Loffler's syndrome (Acute eosinophilic pneumonia)
K. Viral pneumonia - of many different kinds
L. Bacterial pneumonia - of many different kinds

Any patient with one of these well-known, specific diseases or disorders, will now have to be included in the "SARS suspect" group, causing the number of "possible SARS" patients to fraudulently swell, to triple, quadruple, or quintuple the previous numbers!

"Well, then, if there is no such thing as "SARS," WHY are ALL these people dying?" What are they dying from?" you may ask.
a. First, there is NO way for the average American to verify the numbers that are being published by the news media.

b. These numbers of "deaths," if truly occurring, are easily within normal numbers, in these large metropolitan areas, for deaths from plain old pneumonia in young or old, or even routine flu in the elderly.

People are dying in routine numbers from various diseases and disorders that have been around for many decades. That is nothing new! But there is NO evidence to support the popularly promoted idea that their deaths are due to a "new" syndrome called "SARS!"


Unless the CDC, the World Health Organization (WHO), and the US Public Health Department can show us, the American public, and me, as a physician, something more, I must conclude that "SARS" is a Global Scam!


If the disorder of "SARS" doesn't really exist, why is this fraud being perpetrated on America and the world? And by WHOM?

First Question: WHY?

Answer: A) CONTROL!

The following are recent newspaper headlines and/or lead television news stories from around the U.S. and the world:
1) "10,000 Quarantined in Panicked Beijing"

2) "30,000 sent out to Search For SARS Victims" to quarantine them. Question: If I, a highly trained physician, CANNOT distinguish SARS from ANY OTHER type of routine pneumonia based on ANY of the government's published information, how are lay people going to do it?

3) "U.S. Agents Being Trained to Spot SARS" (Associated Press). Homeland Security Department spokesman Dennis Murphy said 22 major U.S. airports, including Kennedy International in New York and Los Angeles International, have public health officials on site.

They can detain ANYONE they choose for ANY reason whatsoever, using the excuse of "SARS."

4) One article about "SARS" in China states that anyone in China that is guilty of spreading the SARS virus to another person, can be shot!

That's the ultimate control!

B) Decrease in Airline Travel:

People are much easier to control if they aren't traveling around. Those committed to revolutionizing the planet earth into a "One World Government" want to do everything possible to induce the population NOT to travel, allowing easier "tracking" of every citizen. (In Communist Russia, before the wall fell, a citizen had to get a "visa" to travel WITHIN the country of Russia, a distance equivalent to that between San Francisco and Los Angeles (approximately 400 miles within the borders of the same country).

And when airline travel falls dramatically, the super-industrialists can "sweep in" and buy up the airline companies at pennies on the dollar.
1) "SARS" is Devastating the Airline Industry:

With decreased travel caused by increased fear, the airlines will probably go bankrupt. Then the super-industrialists who are behind the plans for a One World Government, can buy up ALL the airlines at bargain-basement prices and eliminate ALL competition. They will then be able to make ALL the rules about who can travel and who cannot.

2) The government will be able to quarantine whole cities, or states, or possibly an entire nation, or an airplane full of passengers, or any individual citizen, at the whim of bureaucrats - - based on a "disease" that cannot be specifically identified and doesn't even exist! They can instill TOTAL panic in populations of entire countries, controlling them with great ease.

C) The super-industrialists and framers of a One World Government want to see just how easily the public AND the doctors can be manipulated by an outrageous fable that has absolutely NO basis in fact!

They NOW realize they can tell the public literally ANYTHING, and they will "buy it!" NO ONE will question it, not even the supposed medical "Experts!"

D) The Pharmaceutical companies will be able to make many more billions of dollars by producing yet another NEW vaccine every year or two, that will contain many more deadly substances to force on the population of the U.S. and other countries, as part of their deadly goal of reducing the population of the U.S. and the world.

Second Question: WHO IS BEHIND THIS?

Those promoting a One World Government: The super-international industrialists, those who control the Federal Reserve Bank of the U.S. and the Central Banks of ALL Countries, those who are behind the take-over of ALL the natural resources in Africa, Afghanistan, the former Yugoslavia, AND the Middle East, those who are behind the numerous mergers of many different industries in America, including the banking industry, the defense industry, and the medical industry, to name a few.

Why don't doctors speak up and ask some penetrating questions?

Answer: Because doctors are taught from their first day in their pre-medical studies in college, to:

* NEVER seriously question their superiors,
* NEVER endanger their medical license by "rocking the boat"
* ALWAYS be politically correct
* NEVER question what the majority believes
* NEVER do anything, particularly if it means standing for truth against all odds, that will cause them to lose the respect of their peers

This attitude of unquestioning submission to their superiors continues on throughout medical school, residency and their lifetime of practicing medicine. After all, a doctor's livelihood can be placed in severe jeopardy by those in power above him. A doctor learns early in his or her training, not to step out of line!

To illustrate this "Herd Instinct" of doctors, here are some closely-held "beliefs" of doctors, ALL of which have been completely disproved by literally volumes of documentation!

A. Doctors believe that vaccinations help prevent disease and virtually never have serious, life-threatening side effects, when the truth is that Vaccinations are NEITHER safe NOR effective. (Read Neil Miller's book: Vaccinations: Are they Safe and Effective?")

B. Doctors believe that chemotherapy and radiation are "good" treatments for cancer patients, even though ALL doctors KNOW that BOTH chemotherapy and radiation actually CAUSE cancer and that they BOTH suppress the immune system - the ONLY system that can get a sick patient well!

C. Doctors give out drug prescriptions to patients "like candy" even though doctors know that ALL drugs have serious, often life-threatening, side-effects. And ALL doctors know that the fourth -leading cause of death in America is "adverse effects of drugs prescribed by doctors," and ALL doctors know that the leading cause of falls in the elderly (that frequently cause hip fracture, leading to the patient's ultimate death) is the drugs prescribed by doctors.

Doctors BELIEVE what they are told by: a) their medical school professors, b) the articles in medical journals (although studies have shown that only 1% of those studies are based on sound scientific principles), c) the pharmaceutical company salesmen and saleswomen, who obviously have a completely prejudiced view of treatments since their livelihood depends on disseminating the "party line" of their employer.

A Few Additional Comments:

A) These "new" diseases that suddenly appear, are virtually ALWAYS attributed to either another country (frequently a country that the U.S. or Israeli government is attempting to demonize at that particular moment), or to some animal - common or bizarre. The countries and/or animals include: Asian (flu), China ("SARS"), Monkeys (AIDS), African Rat or Prairie Dogs (Monkeypox), Swine (flu).

It is very important to understand that it is quite unusual for animal viruses to infect humans, and vice versa. In order for that to happen easily, the animal virus must be grown in cultures of human cells. In other words, it must be a deliberate plan to modify the infectivity of an animal virus to make human beings susceptible to it. This is a procedure that is done in U.S. and Israeli laboratories routinely.

B) There WILL be future REAL epidemics similar to AIDS, Ebola Fever, etc. These are for the express purpose of deliberately decreasing the population of the world - - - but SARS is NOT one of them! "SARS" is a GLOBAL HOAX!

C) Many of these "epidemics" will be caused by man-made biological weapons, but not necessarily from an enemy country. The U.S. has its OWN, ACTIVE Biological and Chemical Warfare Program!

Please note the following quote from Bertrand Russell, advisor to Prime Ministers and Presidents, in his book "The Impact of Science on Society":

"At present the population of the world is increasing. . . War so far has had no great effect on this increase . . . I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are other ways . . . If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full . . . the state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it? Really high-minded people are indifferent to suffering, especially the suffering of others."

This is typical of the attitude of those who promote a One World Government, those who propose to rule the world and make slaves of the people.

As stated above, there WILL be MANY serious diseases emerging. However, the majority of them will be man-made in the Biological Weapons Departments of the U.S. and Israel, to be used against the U.S. population.

But "SARS" is NOT one of them. It is a Global Hoax, designed to terrorize the public, and to see just how gullible the public - and the medical establishment have become!

In Conclusion:

If ANYONE can prove to me, on the basis of the published information from the Centers for Disease Control, the World Health Organization, and the US Department of Public Health, as of the posting date of this article, using properly verified statistics and published symptoms, that SARS is indeed, a REAL disease, different from routine pneumonia, I will be happy to pay them $1,000.00 out of my own pocket.

ONE MORE THING:

You do NOT have to fear these emerging diseases, real or fraudulent!

The Best and ONLY way to resist disease is by following the Ten Step Totally Natural Health Plan to make sure your immune system is functioning optimally. This is the Plan I used to reverse my advanced, life-threatening cancer. It is virtually IMPOSSIBLE to get sick if your immune system is functioning properly.

Print this item

Bug The Fallacies of Germ Theory

Posted by: Lordy x2
12-04-2020, 04:34 AM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- No Replies

Print this item

arrow Head of Pfizer Research: Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization

Posted by: Lordy x2
12-03-2020, 09:20 AM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- No Replies

[Image: wodargyeadon-min.jpg]
[Image: spikeproteinclose.jpg]
The vaccine contains a  spike protein (see image) called  syncytin-1, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike protein, we are also training the female body to attack syncytin-1, which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration.

Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition

2020NEWS
On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).

Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.

StarGate TV Series Warned Us In 2001 About the
Vaccination Disaster Facing Us Today
On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.

Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:
  • The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
  • The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
  • The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
  • The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.
CALL FOR HELP: Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask as many EU citizens as possible to co-sign their petition by sending the e-mail prepared here to the EMA.

Print this item

  "A Horrifying Future" - WEF's Vision For A Post-COVID World

Posted by: Lordy x2
11-28-2020, 07:42 PM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- Replies (5)

"A Horrifying Future" - WEF's Vision For A Post-COVID World

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has just published (October 2020) a so-called White Paper, entitled “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda – in a Post-Covid World”.

[Image: Snap-2020-11-28-at-13-13-58.png]
This 31-page document reads like a blueprint on how to “execute” – because an execution (or implementation) would be – “Covid-19 – The Great Reset” (July 2020), by Klaus Schwab, founder and CEO (since the foundation of the WEF in 1974) and his associate Thierry Malleret.

They call “Resetting the Future” a White Paper, meaning it’s not quite a final version. It is a draft of sorts, a trial balloon, to measure people’s reactions. It reads indeed like an executioner’s tale. Many people may not read it – have no awareness of its existence. If they did, they would be up in arms and fight this latest totalitarian blueprint, offered to the world by the WEF.

It promises a horrifying future to some 80%-plus of the (surviving) population. George Orwell’s “1984” reads like a benign fantasy, as compared to what the WEF has in mind for humanity.

The time frame is ten years – by 2030 – the UN agenda 2021 – 2030 should be implemented.

Planned business measures in response to COVID-19:


How does it feel knowing there are people in the world plotting your demise? Not you personally, you in general. What odds do you give yourself of surviving the mounting crises? Me I'm above fifty but not at 100% and that could radically change in the near future because what is going on is cyclic. Crises is the name of the final phase of, "The Four Turnings". The last time this cycle came to head was WWII when people had no compunction about killing each other. This go round will be worse.

The fourth turning is the price society must pay to arrive at a new golden age

Print this item

cube Scientific Analysis of Why Masks are Ineffective, Unnecessary, and Harmful

Posted by: Lordy x2
11-27-2020, 07:51 AM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- No Replies

Some great information on unmasking the truth. Send it out to all your family and friends.

An Evidence Based Scientific Analysis of Why Masks are Ineffective, Unnecessary, and Harmful

Short excerpt from, with link to full article below:

Public Health Authorities changed their minds, but the science did not change. So, what changed their minds?

More than 40 years of science has consistently concluded that masks don’t work. No new science emerged to counter this conclusion. So, what is the basis for the change in direction that emerged from our public health experts?

The following is the Twitter post from Deborah Cohen, UK correspondent for BBC Newsnight and 2019 British Journalism Award winner, indicates that her investigation of the WHO change from not recommending masks to recommending masks had everything to do with politics and lobbying:

Deborah Cohen @deb_cohen

Medically qualified, UK Correspondent @BBCNewsnight | 2019 British Journalism Award winner


“We had been told by various sources WHO committee reviewing the evidence had not backed masks but they recommended them due to political lobbying. This point was put to WHO who did not deny. We said some people think we should not wait for RCTs before putting policies in place”

The ineffectiveness of face masks in stemming the spread of viral respiratory diseases, including Covid-19, is widely known and acknowledged in the scientific and medical literature and scientific communities. Therefore, it seems that the transition in public health recommendations to promote widespread mask mandates was based on a combination of low-level observational studies, speculative mechanistic studies, fear, and, most of all, POLITICS, NOT SCIENCE.

To clear up the confusion, I will argue that the scientific evidence not only does not support the community wearing of face masks, but the evidence shows that healthy people wearing face masks pose serious health risks to wearers.

The Evidence AGAINST Masks

https://www.meehanmd.com/blog/2020-10-10...d-harmful/

Print this item