Latest Threads

Forum Statistics
  • Forum posts:529
  • Forum threads:266
  • Members:374
  • Latest member:Kerrythova

  The Deception of Virology & Vaccines | Why Coronavirus Is Not Contagious

Posted by: Lordy x2
09-26-2020, 05:22 AM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- No Replies

The Deception of Virology & Vaccines | Why Coronavirus Is Not Contagious

This post intends to go to the heart of virology and vaccination itself and what vaccination is propped up by – the entirety of virology and vaccine science is predicated on one thing—that viruses are infectious agents that cause disease.

Without this theory, vaccines would not be ‘effective’ or ‘work’ in the minds of the people.

Without the virus theory, vaccines would crumble like a house of cards.

This article will show the pseudoscience behind the theories that prop up virology and the vast problems with it.


Viruses Are Not Living Organisms

Firstly, viruses are not living organisms or living microbes.

They do not have a respiratory system, nor do they have a nucleus or digestive system.

Viruses are not alive and viruses are not contagious.

The fear behind Coronavirus, for instance, is wholly unwarranted.

Forget everything you think you know about viruses and bacteria. You have been lied to.

The science of virology is based upon the study of viruses. However, no real footage of viral activity exists (except for a recently released (2018) short footage of an HIV virus which shows merely 20% of the virus theory process). Such footage is merely 3D animation and models.

Scientific Encyclopedia states viruses have been obtained for experimentation by means of extremely powerful centrifuges which must be specially built.

Viruses are so small that they average around 0.1 microns in size for a typical virus.


Observation Of Viruses Is Inherently Flawed

Viruses are observed in cell cultures/petri-dish environments.

Cell cultures are grown in controlled conditions outside their natural environment, wherein cells are artificially kept alive by fluids that are toxic and do damage to cellular activity.

In such a sterile environment, cells cannot utilize the full range of their normal cleansing methods as they would in the human body.

Those processes are:

Phagocytosis (and all of its processes)
Bacterial
Fungal
Parasitical
Viral (virus)

In the processes of phagocytosis, cellular debris and dead and dying tissue are absorbed and discarded for elimination out of the body.

It is bacteria that first and foremost carry out this process in large part—mainly as scavengers.

Fungus and parasites are called upon as needed in special cases, and in this process, small amounts of viruses may be utilized to accompany all other processes.

All of these processes are alive, but viruses are not alive.

In such an artificial environment wherein cells are kept alive but not healthy by serums, cells will degenerate, and their viral janitors will become prominent.

Viruses do not multiply on their own. When added to fertile petri-dishes that sustain cellular life, no additional viral protein structures appear.

Only when cells are added is there multiplication of viral protein structures. However, this is because petri-dishes are not the proper or healthy environment for cells, and so viral waste occurs.

This is because cells must manufacture viruses to cleanse themselves in such a toxic environment since they do not have access to the full range of their cleansing processes as would occur in the body. I will show why—

Note: Viruses are necessary to dissolve dead and dying tissue when tissue is so toxic that living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate those tissues, waste, and cellular debris without being poisoned to death.


When Would Viral Activity Become Prominent?

As stated, viruses may accompany these processes in small amounts. However, viruses will only become prominent when all these other processes have been largely killed due to:

Environmental toxicity
Pollution
Chemical inundation
Poor air quality
Poor water quality
Poor food quality
Nutritional deficiencies
Wrong combination or choice of foods
Medical treatment, such as antibiotics and medications

When a body has a high degree of toxicity, bacteria feeding upon that toxic dead matter and tissue will be poisoned to death.

When the body is at such a point of systemic toxicity, where bacterial levels and all living microbes in the body have been diminished or killed due to the above reasons, the body will call upon the help of viruses to help cleanse itself.

When the body cannot utilize milder methods, such as a cold (usually bacterial), it will utilize the help of non-living protein solvents which are known as viruses. I will show why this is the only logical answer.

Viruses help consume and eliminate substances into small particles that can then be expelled via mucous membranes, out through the skin, or through the intestinal tract.

Cells produce viruses when their tissues are so toxic that phagocytes, parasites, bacteria, and fungi cannot help cleanse, repair and regenerate their tissues and fluids.

Science states, incorrectly without proof, that viruses originate outside the body, then ‘hijack’ the RNA or DNA of the cell, and then replicate whilst attacking cells indiscriminately.

If this were true, viruses would replicate endlessly, eventually attacking all healthy cells, but they do not.

We know that antibodies, a type of white blood cell, regulates the virus.

There exists no video evidence of viruses hijacking cells, except for 3D renders, and animations based on theory.


The True Creation of Viruses (simplistic view)

Science falsely claims that viruses replicate themselves. In reality, it is the cell itself that is producing the virus.

Notice how viruses are manufactured by a healthy cell but do not destroy it.

RNA and/or DNA is given by the host cell to dissolve specific substances within the body. If this were not the case, the virus would destroy the cell which created it, but it does not.

The virus is ejected, damaging part of the cell, but not destroying it completely. The cell is then able to repair itself in time.

Cells conspire as one unit to cleanse themselves and their surroundings so that new cellular activity can thrive.

Large amounts of viral activity are present when the body is unable to use milder living microbial detoxification methods to cleanse itself due to systemic toxicity of tissues that poison living microbes.


Steps for Creation of a Virus

  1. Viral proteins part of the genome of the living body existing in every cell which determines what type of proteins will be created by a cell is called into action.
  2. Viral proteins existing in the cell enter the nucleus of the cell. Viruses are manufactured in their whole form within the cell, and sequenced/encoded via RNA/DNA host directives.
  3. The virus leaves the nucleus and is housed in the cell until it leaves the cell.
  4. The virus is ejected by the cell, damaging a part of the cell, but not destroying it.
  5. Viruses change every 72 hours.
Virus replication continues and every 72 hours the first strain is exhausted and an entirely new set of viruses is then manufactured by cells to continue the job of the previous, until the process is complete.

How Viruses are Manufactured | The True Processes of the Virus

Viruses do not infect healthy stable cells. They dissolve dead and decaying cells and tissue, dissolving them so that new cellular activity can thrive.

A good analogy:
Flies appear on dead matter but are not the cause of the dead matter. They are scavengers that break down dead matter. In this way, viruses and bacteria operate in the same exact manner within the body. Without scavengers on Earth to clean up waste, Earth’s air would become toxic. The same processes are carried out in the body on a microscopic macro level.

Science states the opposite of what reality dictates to us through our own observation of nature. This is impossible because our bodies are microcosms for the way nature operates outside our bodies. Assuming the opposite of this goes against our observable nature and is foolish.

As stated, when the normal janitorial functions of the body have been largely diminished and killed due to systemic toxicity, cells can no longer maintain themselves. Red blood cells come together as a whole unit to save themselves and conspire to cleanse themselves by manufacturing solvent protein constructs (virus) that disassemble and break down dead and dying cells, cellular waste, tissue, and foreign debris.

Cells manufacture viruses in their whole form cellularly. In this process, viruses are manufactured directly within the cell using pre-existing viral protein in the cell and genome, and are embedded/encoded with RNA and/or DNA by the host cell.

The cell ejects the virus, which is then regulated by white blood cells through that encoding (antibodies), which oversee the processes of the virus. This allows the viral activity to be controlled and regulated properly.

These two functions are united as one process, and they do not act separately. Once the cell ejects this virus, the cell is partially damaged but is not destroyed. The viruses, which are many, consume and dissolve dead, dying and foreign tissue, debris, unhealthy cells, and cellular waste.

This process takes time depending on the toxicity involved. The effects of their elimination are the symptoms experienced in cold or flu. Viruses break these substances down into tiny particles that can then be expelled via mucous, skin, and bowels.

When the process is complete, the body becomes stronger, so long as that person does not continue to toxify his or her body further. If he or she does, such extreme detoxifications will always occur.


Viral Facts

Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.
Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.
Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.
Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.
Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place.
Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.
Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.
Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.
There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.
Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste.
Viruses are very specific protein structures.
Coughing, sneezing, and spitting is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles.
Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.
Viruses are a result of internal toxicity caused by the environment.
Viruses are cyclical in animals.
Viruses feed upon waste products in the blood and tissue.

The only way to get a virus outside of natural means is via direct injection (vaccine) or blood transfusions of a patient who has a virus. However, in such cases, the body only analyzes it as foreign tissue that must be eliminated.

Since the virus did not originate within the bodily host, that body does not know the time and place that the virus will be active nor does it have the key to decode it (RNA or DNA encoded by the cell) and cannot find the time of its activity.

As such, it is analyzed as a foreign substance that must be eliminated. Protein solvents (viruses) are manufactured of varying strengths to discard this waste if living microbes cannot eliminate it.

Throughout the year, upon season and climatic/temperature changes, the body will dump mass amounts of toxins into the blood for removal. Some of these toxins are so toxic in nature, such as mercury, formaldehyde, and other chemical byproducts, that living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate them without dying.

Non-living proteins are then manufactured by each cell in the corresponding location of the body where this cleansing is necessary. Those toxic substances are disassembled and broken down by viruses so that the body can eliminate them, restoring homeostasis.

The only way viruses can be used as biological weapons is via injection, period. It is possible that such manmade viral strains are included in regular existing vaccines, and this should not be ruled out as a possibility, but as previously stated, viral strains from outside the body are not recognized.

However, man-made substances that are injected can be designed to provoke extreme reactions in humans via various levels of tissue sterilization and adjuvants.

Viruses cannot cross-species ie; from animal to mankind. It is impossible for humans to develop animal flus—A. Because viruses are not contagious, and, B. Because animal RNA/DNA is not compatible with human RNA/DNA.

The only way animal tissue can be observed in the blood is through injection of animal tissues, which make their way to the blood, bypassing the digestive tract. Only then will swine tissue, or bird tissue, or any such animal tissue appear in the body.

When animal meat is consumed by a human, it is converted into human tissue. Human cells cannot produce animal cells or viruses. If we develop viruses, they are human viruses. Even if animal viruses ‘hijacked’ human cells, human cells cannot possibly produce animal viruses Coronavirus is a respiratory virus manufactured by cells in the lungs and respiratory areas to cleanse themselves of systemic toxicity.

Such a cold virus occurs and functions in the following way:
Chemically toxic substances from the air are breathed into the lungs and respiratory system>Toxic particles land onto the surface of the lungs and the fluid-filled sacs in the lungs (alveoli) where they cannot be dislodged or dissolved by living microbes because of their toxicity and nature>Specific non-living protein solvent structures (virus) are then manufactured by cells in the respiratory system to disassemble and break down these substances in the lungs>Mild flu-like symptoms usually result, including coughing and fever, which initiates the cleansing and healing process.

Coughing brings blood and nutrients to the respiratory system. The symptoms associated with their removal are what occurs during SARS. Such airborne toxic substances are caused by burning plastics, formaldehyde, and factory tainted air, which encompasses a wide array of very toxic byproducts.

Older individuals with already weakened immune systems are prone to more advanced respiratory virus detoxifications and will account for most deaths. This illness may crop up in millions due to dense populations like in China breathing in such air on a daily basis. This does not mean it is contagious—it’s not.


The 4 Main Steps For Coronavirus Creation

1. Chemically toxic substances from the air are breathed into the lungs and respiratory system.
2. Toxic particles land onto the surface of the lungs and the fluid-filled sacs in the lungs (alveoli), where they cannot be dislodged or dissolved by living microbes because of their toxicity and nature.
3. Specific non-living protein solvent structures (virus) are then manufactured by cells in the respiratory system to disassemble and break down these substances in the lungs.
4. Mild flu-like symptoms usually result, including coughing and fever, which initiate the cleansing and healing process.


Why Viruses Arise In The Body

As previously stated, the processes of phagocytosis, fungal, parasitical, and bacterial, which are all living microbes, are responsible for consuming and eliminating dead cells, cellular waste, and foreign debris. But when tissue is so toxic that those living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate those substances without being poisoned to death, cells will conspire to cleanse themselves by manufacturing specific non-living solvents know as viruses, which break down and disassemble those substances into particles to be expelled out through the skin, mucus, and bowels.

Viruses leave the cell, damaging only a part of the cell, but not destroying it. Once out of the cell, they are regulated by white blood cell antibodies to dissolve specific tissues and debris necessary to restore relative homeostasis.

Viruses do not destroy the cell wherein they are replicated, yet science states they infect other cells and DO destroy other cells indiscriminately, which has no proof and makes no logical sense. Such a theory is obviously untrue because then viruses would attack every living cell without a cause, killing the body every time, but this does not happen. Viruses only dissolve dead and dying waste in almost all circumstances.

The only time a virus would appear to attack living tissue is when metals are embedded in the tissue, such as polio cases, where viruses have to get into spinal column areas and cleanse tissue. Since metal is hard to remove from the body, it is natural for viruses to break down living tissue to remove those metals, which gives the illusion that the virus is somehow working against the body. In reality, the virus is attempting to heal the systemic toxicity of the body and reverse it.


Conclusion

There is no other explanation for how the human body maintains itself. It is the only logical answer. The truth has been hidden by science for almost 200 years, yet was revealed long ago in the 1800s by scientists such as Antoine Béchamp, who documented in his own experiments that viruses are terrain dependent, non-living agents that break down waste matter, that they come from within, not from without.

Viruses are nothing more than proteins that cleanse. The same is true about cancer. Cancer is another way the body tries to heal itself, by cocooning dead cells in a tumor in which the body is incapable of removing properly so that it can dissolve and cleanse those cells from the body at a later time. The body is miraculous and finds ways to heal no matter the circumstances. It has ways of short-circuiting and short-cutting pathways in times of trouble.

It is sad that modern science has led so many astray in their thinking with regard to their own bodies and how it functions creating nothing but fear and panic, whilst reaping massive amounts of money for those in power as a result. Such fear places a distrust in our own bodies, our neighbors and nature itself, making it appear as if we are powerless in the face of disease; that it is beyond our control and only the medical establishment can save us from ourselves.

How might those in power benefit from such chaos? Explore that thought. This confusion has led to the coronavirus ‘outbreak’ and the resulting fear and chaos which surrounds this manufactured and blown out of proportion event.

This virus is obviously being used to institute police state style laws and measures around the world and these will only increase if the majority do not wake up to the lies surrounding the nature of viruses and disease.


References

The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccination, 1956, by Eleanor McBean M.D., N.D. (shows the many dangers of vaccinations, manipulated statistics throughout history, how polio arose, and the nature of virus and disease.)

Béchamp Or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by E. Douglas Hume, 1923

The Blood and Its Third Element by Antoine Béchamp, 1912

Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth, by Walene James, 1942 (discusses Béchamp’s ‘Terrain Theory’ of bacteria and viruses.)

The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur, R.B. Pearson, 1942 (First published in 1942 under the title ‘Pasteur Plagiarist Imposter!-the Germ Theory Exploded’. Shows that Louis Pasteur plagiarized and distorted the work of professor Antoine Béchamp. The author propounds the viewpoint that bacteria in the body are a result, not a cause of disease, that vaccinations are harmful or at best, ineffective and that Pasteur did not realize the consequences of the vaccines he and his followers created.)

Print this item

graduate Re-Education Prison Schooling in Session! ~ Project Isolation & Humiliation Begins

Posted by: Lordy x2
09-24-2020, 01:38 PM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- Replies (1)

Print this item

cube Covid-19: What you’re NOT being told, what Other Experts are Saying

Posted by: Lordy x2
09-24-2020, 02:16 AM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- No Replies

Covid-19: What you’re NOT being told, what Other Experts are Saying

July 21, 2020 ~ Bro Yew
 
CDC: Only 6% (approx. 9,700) of all the deaths attributed to Covid-19 between the dates 2/1/20 – 8/22/20, did not have comorbidities (other chronic diseases) the other 94% had an average of 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death (accessed 8/31/20)
LINK

CDC: A positive Covid-19 Test result could just mean that you have antibodies from an infection with a virus from the same family of viruses (called coronaviruses), such as the one that causes the common cold 
LINK

CDC: COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents, even if it’s only assumed to have caused, or contributed to death 
LINK

States adopting “revised definition” for “Covid-19 Probable cases”: all contacts of those who’re “Covid-19 confirmed” get added to Covid-19 case count, as if they too are confirmed cases
LINK

Government programs based on a provision in the CARES Act are paying hospitals more for treating patients who’re diagnosed with coronavirus
LINK

Minnesota Senator, Dr. Scott Jensen MD: Through Medicare, hospitals get $13,000 for each Covid-19 Patient, $39,000 if they get put on a ventilator
LINK

Anthony S. Fauci MD (Head of Trump’s Corona Virus Taskforce), Robert R. Redfield (Director of CDC), MD; et. al: Even if one assumes number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza
LINK

Manufactured Pandemic: Testing People for Any Strain of a Coronavirus [which includes common cold/flu, American Medical Association Encyclopedia of Medicine], Not Specifically for COVID-19
LINK

ICU nurse of 30 years: we’re being forced to inflate pandemic numbers – everything is “Covid-19”
LINK

Dr. Scott Jensen (Minnesota Senator and MD): we’re being instructed to fill out death certificates with a diagnosis of Covid-19 whether the person actually died from Covid-19 or Not
LINK

Patients Speak Out: Receiving “Covid-19” Diagnosis without being tested
LINK

A Web site that tracks actual hospital beds in use suggests the model used by top White House health officials to project the trajectory of the coronavirus has so far  overestimated the number of Americans hospitalized by the disease by tens of thousands
LINK

Investigation Reveals Inflated Florida Coronavirus Numbers: Countless labs have reported a 100 percent positivity rate, which means every single person tested was positive. The report showed that Orlando Health had a 98 percent positivity rate. However, when FOX 35 News contacted the hospital, they confirmed errors in the report. Orlando Health’s positivity rate is only 9.4 percent, not 98 percent as in the report.;Orlando Veteran’s Medical Center had a positivity rate of 76 percent. A spokesperson for the VA told FOX 35 News on Tuesday that this does not reflect their numbers and that the positivity rate for the center is actually 6 percent.
LINK

Video Compilation of Citizen Journalists going to “overwhelmed” hospitals and testing sites and finding them empty
LINK

Man Assaulted by Urgent Care CEO for filming video of empty “overwhelmed” Covid-19 testing location
LINK

German Citizen Journalist goes to hospital ‘teeming with coronavirus patients’ – finds no one there
LINK

Amid “Pandemic,” Hospitals Lay Off 1.4M Workers Just In April
LINK

Amid “pandemic”, New Viral video sensation takes internet by storm, evidently triggered by boredom: Dancing Nurses
LINK

CBS Caught Using Footage from Italian Hospital in NYC Report
hLINK

Media Caught Using Dummy in “pandemic” footage
LINK

Crying US COVID-19 nurse video slamming poor working conditions slated as ‘fraudulent’
LINK

‘It’s all fake!’: A Top Chinese official heckled by residents on visit to Wuhan
LINK

COVID-19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless: Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Covid-19, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose, inventor PCR Test indicated inappropriate for detecting viral infection
LINK

Covid-19 test kits dismissed as faulty after returning positive results on samples taken from a goat and a Pawpaw fruit
LINK

What are Koch’s Postulates?
“Evidence required to establish etiologic relationship between microorganism and disease: 1. Micro-organism must be observed in every case of disease (and not present in healthy beings) 2. Must be isolated from all other organic material and grown in pure culture 3. Pure culture when inoculated in healthy beings must reproduce same disease 4. Micro-organism must be recovered from the diseased animal”
LINK

Thomas S. Cowan, MD: This is a crazy situation…None of Koch’s postulates, which has been the medical standard, the world over, for over a hundred years for proving a virus or other micro-organism to be the cause of a disease, have been met, this flies in the face of everything we know about virology, and infectious causation…failure of infectious disease community to follow the actual laws and rules that they set up to prove infectious etiology [i.e. causation]…There is no accurate test for Covid-19, the RT-PCR that’s being used is a surrogate test, cannot prove anything, it’s inventor [kary mullis] explicitly said it “cannot use this test to either prove infectious etiology or to diagnosis an infectious disease”. Positive diagnosis’s are being made based on the arbitrary amplifications of a sequence of RNA which everyone has in their bodies, can result in a “positive” diagnosis with 100% of people tested…People are testing positive one moment, then negative the next…We should all at least be skeptical if not actually look into how do you prove a virus exists, and did the people running this actually do prove that
LINK

Andrew Kaufman, MD: Based on the medical papers published regarding Covid-19, Neither Koch’s Postulates, nor even Rivers’ more lax adaptation of them (which cannot be used to definitely evidence causation) have been met for Covid-19; Major ethical violation here, papers contain flat out lies, the references listed as containing evidence for coivd-19 as “causative agent” of pandemic don’t actually exist in the sources that are cited; this should be condemned, being used to dictate world policies, but science isn’t their to back it up
LINK

Dr. Tim O’Shea Offers $5,000 reward for proof that Covid-19 Exists, explains why none of the testing driving the daily numbers of cases, whether by symptoms, blood test (antibodies), PCR, or Test kits can be considered reliable or conclusive
LINK

President of the United States retweets game show host Chuck Woolery’s claim that ‘everyone is lying’ about coronavirus
LINK

12 Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic
-Dr Sucharit Bhakdi (Microbiologist, professor Johannes Gutenberg University, head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene)

-Dr Wolfgang Wodarg (Physician, Pulmonologist, Former chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe)

-Dr Joel Kettner (professor Community Health Sciences and Surgery Manitoba University, former Chief Public Health Officer for Manitoba province and Medical Director of the International Centre for Infectious Diseases)

-Dr John Ioannidis (Professor of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy and of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine. Director of the Stanford Prevention Research Center)

-Dr Yoram Lass (Physician, former Director General of the Health Ministry, Associate Dean of the Tel Aviv University Medical School)

-Dr Pietro Vernazza (Physician specializing Infectious Diseases at the Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Professor of Health Policy.)

-Frank Ulrich (radiologist, former President of the German Medical Association, Deputy Chairman World Medical Association.)

-Prof. Hendrik Streeck (HIV researcher, epidemiologist, clinical trialist, Professor of virology, director of the Institute of Virology and HIV Research,Bonn University.

-Dr Yanis Roussel et. al. – A team of researchers from the Institute Hospitalo-universitaire Méditerranée Infection, Marseille and the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, conducting a peer-reviewed study on Coronavirus mortality for the government of France under the ‘Investments for the Future’ programme.

-Dr. David Katz (Physician, Founding director of the Yale University Prevention Research Center)

-Michael T. Osterholm (regents professor, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota.

–Dr Peter Goetzsche (Professor of Clinical Research Design and Analysis at the University of Copenhagen, founder of the Cochrane Medical Collaboration.)
LINK

8 MORE Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic

-Dr John Lee (consultant histopathologist Rotherham General Hospital, former clinical professor of pathology at Hull York Medical School)

-Dr. John Oxford (virologist, Professor at Queen Mary, University of London)

-Prof Knut Wittkowski (professor of epidemiology, former head Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design Rockefeller University, New York)

-Dr Klaus Püschel (forensic pathologist, former professor of forensics Essen University, director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf)

-Dr Alexander Kekulé (doctor, biochemist, Chair for Medical Microbiology and Virology at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Director Institute for Medical Microbiology University Hospital Halle)

-Dr Claus Köhnlein (Internist, co-author book Virus Mania)

-Dr Gérard Krause (head Department for EpidemiologyHelmholtz Centre for Infection in Braunschweig, director of the Institute for Infectious Disease Epidemiology TWINCORE in Hannover, Chair of the PhD Program Epidemiology at the Hannover Medical School. Coordinator Translational Infrastructure Epidemiology at the German Centre for Infection Research)

-Dr Gerd Gigerenzer (psychologist, professor of psychology and Director of the Harding Center for Risk Literacy Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin)
LINK

How About the Masks?

CDC: “no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks… loose-fitting devices that were designed to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds…There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure.” (CDC Medical Journal published May, 2020)
LINK

“people should not be walking around with masks, there is no reason to be walking around with a mask…when you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the prefect protection people think it is, and often there are unintended consequences, people keep fiddling with the mask, and they keep touching their face…when you think of masks, you should think of health care providers needing them, and people who are ill”-Dr. Anthony Fauci MD, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, from a 3/8/20 60 Minutes interview
LINK

World Health Organization: Asymptomatic spread of coronavirus is very rare (6/8/20)
LINK

Dr. Jenny Harries: facemasks, may increase risk of coronavirus infection, by touching objects, then mask, virus can get trapped in the material and causes infection when the wearer breathes in
LINK

Ohio State Senator Nino Vitale proves wearing masks causes available oxygen drops to levels below what OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) has declared to be safe
LINK

National Library of Medicine: Brain cells are very sensitive to a lack of oxygen. Some brain cells start dying less than 5 minutes after their oxygen supply disappears. As a result, brain hypoxia can rapidly cause severe brain damage or death.
LINK

Andrew Kaufman MD: Clinical studies suggest those who wear masks increase risk of getting flu, masks have negative psychological and social consequences, restrict your breathing, can be very problematic even for a healthy person with no breathing or respiratory illness, the materials they are made of are toxic, have pore size/gaps too large to filter out viruses
LINK

Dr. Steven Gundry, MD: masks do not protect against viral transmission, they are permeable to viruses, designed to prevent bacteria from contaminating wounds, but double blind study suggests not even effective at that, proved less infections occurred with group not wearing masks
LINK

Cardiac Unit RN Danika Bueno: Wearing Masks highly ineffective against viruses, creates crucial PH imbalance, and forces one to breathe in bacteria flora which hurting the body, and thus rendering one more prone to becoming infected
LINK/

Jeffrey I. Barke, MD: I represent thousands of physicians across the country whose voices are being silenced because we don’t agree with the mainstream media. “Experts” are wrong, wearing masks in public not effective, quarantining healthy doesn’t save lives
LINK

University Southern Califonia & L.A. County Public Health study: Covid-19 case fatality rate is .1-.3 percent, similar to common flu
LINKI

Dr. Jen Ashton, Surgeon, Chief Medical Correspondent ABC News: masks can actually cause more harm than good, they are for sick people to protect the healthy people around them, they serve as emotional or psychological protection for people, but in reality is they don’t really provide us with protection, not capable of blocking coronaviruses or influenza, they can go right through
LINK

Jin Dongyan Virologist, MD: Many people are now panicking, and some actually are exaggerating the risks, more than 80 percent of confirmed coronavirus cases are not severe, most cases mild
LINK

Neurosurgeon Dr. Russell blaylock, Sherri Tenpenny MD: wearing masks decrease oxygen in blood, increase Co2, acidity, feeds cancer cells, forces inhalation of Viruses/bacteria that live in/around mouth/nose, also has negative social impact on babies/children
LINK

Epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski: Coronavirus could be ‘exterminated’ if lockdowns were lifted
LINK

Biological Engineer Dr. V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai, M.I.T. PhD: Masks are actually harmful on so many levels, psychologically, emotionally, and physically..as someone who’s studied the immune system everyday, in and out, this entire thing will go down in history as one of the biggest fear mongering hoaxes to destroy economies, to push mandated vaccines, and to suppress dissent..we need to personally build up our immune systems, government shouldn’t be involved. ..Social distancing is non-sense, has made us enemies of our neighbors
LINK

Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine Rashid A Buttar, FAAPM, FACAM, FAAIM: No benefit from wearing mask, Pores to big to filter viruses. Masks actually hurt you. If you wear a face mask, you are restricting your oxygen andincreasing the amount of carbon dioxide you’re breathing in, and studies have shown actually increasing the amount of bacteria you’re breathing, including the poly-propylene components of the face mask which gradual degrade, causing histotoxic-hypoxia injury, increased cortisol stimulating fight or flight response, which suppresses immune system.
LINK

Dr. Dan Erickson MD, and Dr. Artin Massihi, MD: We have combined 40 years of experience.. We’ve made it our lives work to understand this stuff.. the immune system is built by being exposed to antigens, viruses, bacteria, etc. You don’t take a small child, put them in bubble wrap in a room, and tell them “go have a healthy immune system, this is immunology, microbiology 101.. this is the basisis of what we’ve known for years. When you take human beings and say go in your house, wash your hands clean all your counters, lysol them down…kill 99% of viruses and bacteria, wear a mask, don’t go outside.. This is the stuff we need to survive. What does it do to our immune system? Our immune system is used to touching, we share bacteria, viruses, etec. and create an immune system daily to this stuff. When you take that away, shelter in place, the immune system drops, you stay there for months, drops more. Let’s follow the science.
LINK/

Video shows that as soon as the cameras are believed to be off, the press immediately takes off their masks
LINK

So then, who’s telling the Truth? You decide:
Medical errors are the third-leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer
LINK

U.S. Repeals Propaganda Ban, Spreads Government-Made News to Americans (July 14, 2013)
LINK

CIA has global media machine, ex-aides say (Philadelphia Inquirer, Pg. 11A, Oct. 3, 1986)
LINK

Compilation video proves that all local news parroting 100% identical scripts, indicating central writer/authority, and therfore no actual journalism/research is occuring
LINK

“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.”-J. Edgar Hoover (Director, founder of FBI), The Elks Magazine (August 1956).

A ‘Plan-demic’?

World Bank: Millions of “Covid-19” tests were purchased by the nations of the world in 2018
LINK

Fauci in 2017: ‘No doubt’ Trump will face surprise infectious disease outbreak
LINK

Leading Scientist Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe Predicted Pandemic on November 25th 2019
LINK/

A 2017 Pentagon Memo Foretold Today’s Pandemic With Creepy Accuracy
LINK

Just weeks before Covid-19 Outbreak, World Economic Forum, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Anthony S. Fauci is part of their “Leadership council” for their collaboration between W.H.O., U.N., and NIAID called “Decade of Vaccines – a Global vaccine action plan”), and Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security host coronavirus pandemic simulation called “Event 201”
LINK

A 2010 Rockefeller Foundation & Global Business Network document entitled “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” contains a scenario dubbed “Lock Step” where a pandemic is used for “A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with innovation and growing citizen pushback”
LINK

Television series “The Last Man on Earth” (S3 EP 10, aired 3/5/17) portrays a Pandemic of a bad flu strain (i.e. type of corona virus), depicts Americans including toddlers (and dogs) wearing masks, incessant use of hand sanitizer, posters around town with sanitization guidelines, mentions “something fishy is going on”, a federal pandemic agency that issues guidelines for “combating the emerging viral outbreak”, and need for vaccine, ends by depicting empty/looted stores
LINK

World Bank made $325M Issuing “first ever” high risk/interest “Pandemic Bonds”, “to raise money for developing countries in a pandemic” in 2017, were set to mature July 2020, Covid-19 outbreak, designation as pandemic before June, causes default of $425M for investors
LINK

Song by Dr Creep titled “Pandemic” from 2013 contains lyrics “2020 combined with corona virus, bodies stacking”
LINK

William Strauss & Neil Howe (treators of “generational theory”, i.e. “Baby Boomers”, “Gen. X”, “Millennials” etc.) in their 1997 Book, “Fourth Turning”, predicted before 2025, “A spark will ignite a new mood.The CDC announce the spread of a new communicable virus. Congress enacts mandatory quarantine measures. Mayors resist. Urban gangs battle suburban militias. … Anger at ‘mistakes we made’ will translate into calls for action, regardless of the heightened public risk…. Many Americans won’t know where their savings are, who their employer is, what their pension is, or how their government works. The era will have left the financial world arbitraged and tentacled;”
LINK

Covid-19 shares name with Catholic Church’s patron saint of epidemics, St. Corona
LINK

Asterix Comic Series features Character “Coronavirus…straight from Rome [i.e. the Church of Rome]” in 2017
LINK

Covid-19 Aid Funds from the Government received by the Catholic church may have reached — or even exceeded — $3.5 billion, making it the biggest winners in the U.S. government’s pandemic relief efforts
LINK

Compilation Video Demonstrates that all the Major Corporations that are Putting Out Covid-19 Sympathy Commercials using exact same music, script, catch phrases,etc.
LINK

Ex-NSA employee Edward Snowden Warns Governments Are Using Coronavirus to Build ‘the Architecture of Oppression’
LINK

SCIENCE IS REAL
(but that which is based on lies, false premises, and presumptions, though it be relayed by “scientists”, is NOT science)

-QUARANTINE IS FOR THE SICK NOT THE HEALTHY-
MY BODY, MY CHOICE

Print this item

Rainbow Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says ... "Pandemic is Over"

Posted by: Lordy x2
09-23-2020, 09:04 PM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- No Replies

Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says "Second Wave" Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, "Pandemic is Over"

In a stunning development, a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says "there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen." The "Big Pharma" insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a "second wave" based on "new cases."

Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, says that half or even "almost all" of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already.

In an interview last week Dr. Yeadon was asked:

"we are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six people in a meeting...all based on, what may well be, completely fake data on this coronavirus?"

Dr. Yeadon answered with a simple "yes."

Dr. Yeadon said in the interview that, given the "shape" of all important indicators in a worldwide pandemic, such as hospitalizations, ICU utilization, and deaths, "the pandemic is fundamentally over."

Yeadon said in the interview:
"Were it not for the test data that you get from the TV all the time, you would rightly conclude that the pandemic was over, as nothing much has happened. Of course people go to the hospital, moving into the autumn flu season...but there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen."

In a paper published this month, which was co-authored by Yeadon and two of his colleagues, "How Likely is a Second Wave?", the scientists write:
"It has widely been observed that in all heavily infected countries in Europe and several of the US states likewise, that the shape of the daily deaths vs. time curves is similar to ours in the UK. Many of these curves are not just similar, but almost super imposable."

In the data for UK, Sweden, the US, and the world, it can be seen that in all cases, deaths were on the rise in March through mid or late April, then began tapering off in a smooth slope which flattened around the end of June and continues to today. The case rates however, based on testing, rise and swing upwards and downwards wildly.

Media messaging in the US is already ramping up expectations of a "second wave."


Survival Rate of COVID Now Estimated to be 99.8%, Similar to Flu, Prior T-Cell Immunity

The survival rate of COVID-19 has been upgraded since May to 99.8% of infections. This comes close to ordinary flu, the survival rate of which is 99.9%. Although COVID can have serious after-effects, so can flu or any respiratory illness. The present survival rate is far higher than initial grim guesses in March and April, cited by Dr. Anthony Fauci, of 94%, or 20 to 30 times deadlier. The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) value accepted by Yeadon et al in the paper is .26%. The survival rate of a disease is 100% minus the IFR.

Dr. Yeadon pointed out that the "novel" COVID-19 contagion is novel only in the sense that it is a new type of coronavirus. But, he said, there are presently four strains which circulate freely throughout the population, most often linked to the common cold.

In the scientific paper, Yeadon et al write:
"There are at least four well characterised family members (229E, NL63, OC43 and HKU1) which are endemic and cause some of the common colds we experience, especially in winter. They all have striking sequence similarity to the new coronavirus."

The scientists argue that much of the population already has, if not antibodies to COVID, some level of "T-cell" immunity from exposure to other related coronaviruses, which have been circulating long before COVID-19.

The scientists write:
"A major component our immune systems is the group of white blood cells called T-cells whose job it is to memorise a short piece of whatever virus we were infected with so the right cell types can multiply rapidly and protect us if we get a related infection. Responses to COVID-19 have been shown in dozens of blood samples taken from donors before the new virus arrived."

Introducing the idea that some prior immunity to COVID-19 already existed, the authors of "How Likely is a Second Wave?" write:
"It is now established that at least 30% of our population already had immunological recognition of this new virus, before it even arrived...COVID-19 is new, but coronaviruses are not."

They go on to say that, because of this prior resistance, only 15-25% of a population being infected may be sufficient to reach herd immunity:
"...epidemiological studies show that, with the extent of prior immunity that we can now reasonably assume to be the case, only 15-25% of the population being infected is sufficient to bring the spread of the virus to a halt..."

In the US, accepting a death toll of 200,000, and an infection fatality rate of 99.8%, this would mean for every person who has died, there would be about 400 people who had been infected, and lived. This would translate to around 80 million Americans, or 27% of the population. This touches Yeadon's and his colleagues' threshold for herd immunity.

The authors say:
"current literature finds that between 20% and 50% of the population display this pre-pandemic T-cell responsiveness, meaning we could adopt an initially susceptible population value from 80% to 50%. The lower the real initial susceptibility, the more secure we are in our contention that a herd immunity threshold (HIT) has been reached."

Masthead for "Lockdown Skeptics.org" publisher of "How Likely is a Second Wave?" | Source


The False Positive Second Wave

Of the PCR test, the prevalent COVID test used around the world, the authors write:
"more than half of the positives are likely to be false, potentially all of them."

The authors explain that what the PCR test actually measures is "simply the presence of partial RNA sequences present in the intact virus," which could be a piece of dead virus which cannot make the subject sick, and cannot be transmitted, and cannot make anyone else sick.

"...a true positive does not necessarily indicate the presence of viable virus. In limited studies to date, many researchers have shown that some subjects remain PCR-positive long after the ability to culture virus from swabs has disappeared. We term this a ‘cold positive’ (to distinguish it from a ‘hot positive’, someone actually infected with intact virus). The key point about ‘cold positives’ is that they are not ill, not symptomatic, not going to become symptomatic and, furthermore, are unable to infect others."

Overall, Dr. Yeadon builds the case that any "second wave" of COVID, and any government case for lockdowns, given the well-known principles of epidemiology, will be entirely manufactured.

In Boston this month, a lab suspended doing coronavirus testing after 400 false positives were discovered.

An analysis of PCR-based test at medical website medrxiv.org states:
"data on PCR-based tests for similar viruses show that PCR-based testing produces enough false positive results to make positive results highly unreliable over a broad range of real-world scenarios."

The most famous incidence of PCR test unreliability, of course, was when the President of Tanzania revealed to the world that he had covertly sent samples from a goat, a sheep, and a pawpaw fruit to a COVID testing lab. They all came back positive for COVID.


Made in China

In August, the government of Sweden discovered 3700 false COVID positives from test kits made by China's BGI Genomics. The kits were approved in March by the FDA for use in the US.


Second Waves of Coronaviruses Not Normal

Dr. Yeadon challenged the idea that all pandemics take place in subsequent waves, citing two other coronavirus outbreaks, the SARS virus in 2003, and MERS in 2012. What may seem like two waves can actually be two single waves occurring in different geographical regions. They say data gathered from the relatively recent SARS 2003 and the MERS outbreaks support their contention.

In the case of the MERS:
"it is actually multiple single waves affecting geographically distinct populations at different times as the disease spreads. In this case the first major peak was seen in Saudi Arabia with a second peak some months later in the Republic of Korea. Analysed individually, each area followed a typical single event..."

In the interview, when questioned about the Spanish Flu epidemic of 1918, which came in successive waves during World War I, Yeadon pointed out that this was an entirely different kind of virus, not in the coronavirus family. Others have blamed general early century malnutrition and unsanitary conditions. World War I soldiers, hard hit, lived in cold mud and conditions the worst imaginable for immune resistance.

Saudi and Korea Waves of MERS Coronavirus


Lockdowns Don't Work

Another argument made by Yeadon et al in their September paper is that there has been no difference in outcomes related to lockdowns.

They say:
"The shape of the deaths vs. time curve implies a natural process and not one resulting mainly from human interventions...Famously, Sweden has adopted an almost laissez faire approach, with qualified advice given, but no generalised lockdowns. Yet its profile and that of the UK’s is very similar."


Mild-Mannered Yeadon Demolishes Man Who Started It All, Professor Neil Ferguson

The former Pfizer executive and scientist singles out one former colleague for withering rebuke for his role in the pandemic, Professor Neil Ferguson. Ferguson taught at Imperial College while Yeadon was affiliated. Ferguson's computer model provided the rationale for governments to launch draconian orders which turned free societies into virtual prisons overnight. Over what is now estimated by the CDC to be a 99.8% survival rate virus.

Dr. Yeardon said in the interview that "no serious scientist gives any validity" to Ferguson's model.

Speaking with thinly-veiled contempt for Ferguson, Dr. Yeardon took special pains to point out to his interviewer:
"It's important that you know most scientists don't accept that it [Ferguson's model] was even faintly right...but the government is still wedded to the model."

Yeardon joins other scientists in castigating governments for following Ferguson's model, the assumptions of which all worldwide lockdowns are based on. One of these scientists is Dr. Johan Giesecke, former chief scientist for the European Center for Disease Control and Prevention, who called Ferguson’s model “the most influential scientific paper” in memory, and also “one of the most wrong.”

It was Ferguson's model which held that "mitigation" measures were necessary, i.e. social distancing and business closures, in order to prevent, for example, over 2.2 million people dying from COVID in the US.

Ferguson predicted that Sweden would pay a terrible price for no lockdown, with 40,000 COVID deaths by May 1, and 100,000 by June. Sweden's death count is now 5800. The Swedish government says this coincides to a mild flu season. Although initially higher, Sweden now has a lower death rate per-capita than the US, which it achieved without the terrific economic damage still ongoing in the US. Sweden never closed restaurants, bars, sports, most schools, or movie theaters. The government never ordered people to wear masks.

Dr. Yeadon speaks bitterly of the lives lost as a result of lockdown policies, and of the "savable" countless lives which will be further lost, from important surgeries and other healthcare deferred, should lockdowns be reimposed, .

Yeardon is a successful entrepreneur, the founder of a biotech company which was acquired by Novartis, another pharmaceutical giant. Yeadon's unit at Pfizer was the Asthma and Respiratory Research Unit. (Yeadon, partial list of publications.)

Sweden During International "Lockdowns"


Why is All This Happening? US Congressman Says He is Convinced of "Government Plan" to Continue Lockdowns Until a Mandatory Vaccine. Conspiracy Theories?

The list of news items grows which reflects unfavorably upon the narrative being played out on the major television networks, of a mysterious, "novel" virus which has been controlled only by an unprecedented assault on individual rights and liberties, now ready to pounce again, on already suffering populations with no choice but to submit to further government orders.

Governors have quietly extended their powers indefinitely by shifting the goalpost, without saying so, from "flattening the curve" to ease the strain on hospitals, to "no new cases." From "pandemic," to "case-demic."

In Germany, an organization of 500 German doctors and scientists has formed, who say that government response to the COVID virus has been vastly out of proportion to the actual severity of the disease.

Evidence of chicanery mounts. Both the CDC, and US Coronavirus Task Force headed by Dr. Deborah Birx, are candid that the definition of death-by-COVID has been flexible, and that the rules favor calling it COVID whenever possible. This opens the possibility of a vastly inflated death count. In New York, Governor Andrew Cuomo's administration is under federal investigation for all but signing the death warrants for thousands of nursing home elderly, when the state sent COVID patients into the nursing homes, over the helpless objections of nursing home executives and staff.

Why are the major media ignoring what would seem to be an eminently newsworthy item, an industry rockstar like Yeadon, calling out the biggest guns in the public health world? Would not the Sunday talk shows, the Chris Wallaces and Meet the Press, want to grill such a man for record audiences?

Here the talk may turn to dark agendas, and not just mere incompetence, obtuseness, and stupidity.

One opinion was put forth by US Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) when he said on the Tom Woods Show on August 16th:
“The secret the government is keeping from you is that they plan to keep us shut down until there is some kind of vaccine, and then whether it’s compulsory at the federal level, or the state level, or maybe they persuade your employers though another PPP program that you won’t qualify for unless you make your employees get the vaccine, I think that’s their plan. Somebody convince me that’s not their plan, because there is no logical ending to this other than that.”

Another theory is that the COVID crisis is being used consolidate never-before-imaged levels of control over individuals and society by elites. This is put forth by the nephew of the slain president, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., son of also-assassinated Bobby Kennedy. In a speech at a massive anti-lockdown, anti-mandatory vaccination rally in Germany, Bobby Jr. warned of the existence of a:
“bio-security agenda, the rise of the authoritarian surveillance state and the Big Pharma sponsored coup d’etat against liberal democracy...The pandemic is a crisis of convenience for the elite who are dictating these policies,”

The warnings of dire intentions of Kennedy's "elite" are coming from more mainstream sources. Dr. Joseph Marcela, of the highly trusted, mega-traffic medical information site Mercola.com, has penned a careful review of one doctor's claims of genetics-altering vaccines coming our way.

And it does not assuage fears that a defense establishment website, Defense One, reports that permanent under-the skin biochips, injectable by the same syringe that holds a vaccine, may soon be approved by the FDA.

In 1957, a pandemic hit, the H2N2 Asian Flu with a .7% Infection Fatality Rate, which killed as many people per capita in the US as the COVID has claimed now. There was never a single mention of it in the news at the time, never mind the extraordinary upheaval that we see now. In 1968 the Hong Kong Flu hit the US (.5% IFR,) taking 100,000 people when the US had a markedly lower population. Not single alarm was raised, not a single store closed nor even a network news story. The following summer the largest gathering in US history took place, Woodstock.

Mass hysteria is never accidental, but benefits someone. The only question left to answer is, who?

LINK

Print this item

Tongue The 1918 Spanish flu... when researchers attempted to spread it no one got sick

Posted by: Lordy x2
09-22-2020, 10:11 AM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- Replies (1)

The 1918 Spanish flu is said to have been one of the most highly virulent, contagious diseases of all time, but when researchers attempted to spread it from person to person -- by directly spraying "infectious" secretions into people's noses, eyes and throats -- no one got sick

The 1918 flu pandemic, also known as the Spanish flu, is considered to be one of the most severe pandemics in history. Said to have been caused by an H1N1 virus that originated in birds, it spread around the globe from 1918 to 1919, infecting about 500 million people, or one-third of the world's population at that time. An estimated 50 million people were said to have died due to the 1918 flu pandemic, 675,000 of them in the U.S.[i]

To this day, there remain many questions about this pandemic and the virus that is said to have caused it. "While the 1918 H1N1 virus has been synthesized and evaluated, the properties that made it so devastating are not well understood," the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admits.[ii]

Although the 1918 H1N1 virus was said to be highly virulent and spread via human contact, what is even more curious is that laboratory experiments were never able to confirm this. In fact, when researchers took every measure they could think of to infect people with the virus, they were unsuccessful, calling into question whether it was, in fact, spread from person to person.

Scientists Fail to Infect Other Humans With 1918 Spanish Flu

Infecting humans with a flu virus for the sake of medical research is no longer deemed ethical, but this wasn't the case during the 1918 to 1919 pandemic, when Dr. Milton Rosenau, an infectious disease expert, conducted human experiments on U.S. Navy sailors in cooperation with the Public Health Service and the U.S. Navy.[iii]

Volunteers from the U.S. Naval Training Station in Deer Island, Boston, who "appeared to be in excellent physical condition," took part in the study,[iv] which consisted of the scientists attempting to infect the healthy volunteers with the flu. To do this, they collected various secretions from people sick with the flu -- nasal secretions, mucous from their throats and even direct coughing in the face -- and exposed the volunteers.

The donors were said to be early in the disease, within the first, second or third day, to ensure they would still be contagious. The infectious substances were then sprayed into the volunteers' nostrils, throat and eyes, and then the researchers waited 10 days for them to become ill -- but "none of them took sick in any way."[v] Writing in the journal Public Health Reports, John Eyler, Ph. D., of the University of Minnesota, explained:

"[Volunteers] … were inoculated with mixtures of other organisms isolated from the throats and noses of influenza patients. Next, some volunteers received injections of blood from influenza patients. Finally, 13 of the volunteers were taken into an influenza ward and exposed to 10 influenza patients each.

Each volunteer was to shake hands with each patient, to talk with him at close range, and to permit him to cough directly into his face. None of the volunteers in these experiments developed influenza."[vi]

Other research has also failed to show human-to-human transmission of influenza, with one 2003 review conducted by U.S. CDC scientists and colleagues concluding, "Our review found no human experimental studies published in the English-language literature delineating person-to-person transmission of influenza."[vii]

Edwin Jordan, a public health scientist who conducted some of the most well-known research into the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic,[viii] also reported in 1927 that five studies failed to demonstrate sick-to-well transmission of influenza.

"Jordan reports that all five studies failed to support sick-to-well transmission, in spite of having numerous acutely ill influenza patients, in various stages of their illness, carefully cough, spit, and breathe on a combined total of >150 well patients," according to a review published in Virology in 2008.[ix] Rosenau's study was the largest among them.

Scientists Caution Against Concluding the Obvious

Even after failing to infect people with the flu despite multiple direct exposures, Rosenau stated, "We must be very careful not to draw any positive conclusions from the negative results of this kind."[x] At the same time, he acknowledged:

"We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease."[xi]

Their report documented eight other studies that also failed to identify how the Spanish flu was spread, but said perhaps other factors were involved relating to how the virus was discharged from or entered the body. Perhaps, some suggested, the volunteers were already immune. But some of the volunteers were specifically included because they had no prior exposure to influenza.

Others suggested that the virus donors may have no longer been infectious, but the patients were said to have been within their first three days of illness, when viral shedding should be at its peak.[xii] "It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases could not be transferred under experimental conditions," Eyler wrote.[xiii]

Their study effectively showed that the 1918 Spanish flu was not a contagious disease, but they still theorized that perhaps if they had been more aggressive in exposing the volunteers (more aggressive than directly spraying "infectious" nasal secretions up someone's nose?), they would have gotten a different result.

It's even been suggested that perhaps the donors didn't actually have the flu at all, but it's believed that physicians were highly capable of diagnosing influenza in 1918, and all the donors were symptomatic, making this highly unlikely. "Obviously, another explanation is that sick-to-well transmission is not the usual mode of contagion," the Virology Journal review added.[xiv]

Indeed, the real disease here appears to be in researchers believing what they want to believe -- in this case that the Spanish flu was easily transmitted from person to person -- even if the science clearly says otherwise.

References

[i] U.S. CDC, 1918 Pandemic (H1N1 virus) https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resourc...-h1n1.html

[ii] U.S. CDC, 1918 Pandemic (H1N1 virus) https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resourc...-h1n1.html

[iii] Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 27-36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/

[iv] Experiments Upon Volunteers to Determine the Cause and Mode of Spread of Influenza, Boston, November and December 1918, Page 7 https://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3750flu.0016.573

[v] Virology Journal volume 5, Article number: 29 (2008) https://link.springer.com/article/10.118...-422X-5-29

[vi] Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 27-36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/

[vii] Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 37, Issue 8, 15 October 2003, Pages 1094-1101, https://doi.org/10.1086/378292 https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/37/8/1094/2013282

[viii] Epidemic Influenza. A Survey. 1927 pp.599 pp. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abst...9292700266

[ix] Virology Journal volume 5, Article number: 29 (2008) https://link.springer.com/article/10.118...-422X-5-29

[x] Medium June 1, 2020 https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/s...91b37c4dd8

[xi] Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 27-36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/

[xii] Medium June 1, 2020 https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/s...91b37c4dd8

[xiii] Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 27-36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/

[xiv] Virology Journal volume 5, Article number: 29 (2008) https://link.springer.com/article/10.118...-422X-5-29

Print this item

  Apollo A7L/A7LB Lunar Overboot

Posted by: Aladin
09-20-2020, 07:54 PM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- Replies (3)

Apollo A7L/A7LB Lunar Overboot

One of the most iconic images of the Apollo program is Buzz Aldrin's footprint on the lunar surface:

[Image: AS11-40-5878-sm.jpg]

NASA photo AS11-40-5880.

The boot which left the footprint was simply called the lunar overboot or lunar boot, one of the few parts of the Apollo spacesuit which did not have a long name requiring an acronym for everyday use. This boot was worn over the main space suit (pressure garment assembly, or PGA) boot.

The lunar overboots were donned prior to lunar surface activity and provided thermal and abrasion protection for the PGA boots during lunar surface operations. The outer layer of the lunar overboot, except for the sole, was fabricated from a woven chromium steel fabric called Chromel-R. Chromel-R was a new fabric at the time and cost (depending upon the source of the information) $2,000 or $2,775 per yard. The Chromel-R was qualified to withstand temperatures up to 1,200° F and also provided a cut-resistant protective barrier between the PGA boot and potentially sharp rocks on the lunar surface.

http://heroicrelics.org/info/suits/a7l-l...rboot.html

Print this item

  CDC Director Says He Thinks Masks Work Better Than Vaccines

Posted by: Lordy x2
09-19-2020, 10:53 PM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- No Replies

[Image: Bill-Gates-vaccine-dangers.jpg]

A few months ago Dr. Fraudci said People Should Not Wear Masks!

All hail Dr. Fraudci.

Then he, and the WHO, and the CDC changed their uni-mind and mask craziness took over the world.

Then the WHO said masks are really only for health service personnel who know how to use them.

But then the CDC director just said that "life-saving" masks work much better than a vaccine for Covid-19.

Mask-on. Mask-off.

Is your head spinning yet?

In summary: Masks Work against a killer disease which is so bad that you have a 99.8% survival rate if you get it; so, we don’t need a vaccine, but can just keep on being muzzled forever.

Or alternatively – Masks Don’t Work, because there’s no killer disease, but we still need to wear them so they can keep us quiet until Dr. Kill Bill Jr. can make money off his planned vaccine massacre. (And take out a few million of the population at the same time as planned by Daddy Kill Bill before him…RIP. Too bad he’s missing the grand eugenics finale)

Get real.

Have you seen the one with the guys in the hazmat suits removing the surfers from the beach?

That’s virus protection!

Not a crumpled piece of paper or fabric stuffed into your glove compartment, re-used every time you are forced to wear it to go into a public space.

Shaming People-Against-Masks has become the trendiest bullying of the year. Taking over from the ‘I see you on the beach and am calling the police’ bullies. And the ‘how dare you walk your dog or hug an old person’ bullies.

Print this item

Star The west is burning yet again

Posted by: Lordy x2
09-08-2020, 02:35 AM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- Replies (1)

WASHINGTON, USA — Multiple wildfires are burning throughout the Inland Northwest on Labor Day amid windy conditions.

State forest managers are urging people to be careful with fires as they fan out across Washington state for a hot, dry Labor Day weekend.

“The risk that is out there because of human-caused fires is up tremendously,” said Washington State Forester George Geissler.

He said people who are new to the outdoors during the coronavirus pandemic need to be especially cautious, and everyone should take note of burn bans.
.



[Image: oo8mTQj.jpg]

Yikes!

Print this item

  They are losing the rein in Spain!

Posted by: Lordy x2
09-07-2020, 11:18 PM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- No Replies

Print this item

graduate Arctic summer sea ice could disappear as early as 2035

Posted by: Lordy x2
09-07-2020, 09:18 PM
Forum: The Truth is in Here
- No Replies

Arctic summer sea ice could completely disappear as early as 2035
By the time a toddler graduates from high school, summer sea ice in the high North could be a thing of the past and that's just the tip of the iceberg as they say.

[Image: deb9e1227daa3a8947c9a7bcac81cf26.jpg]

If one were to design a weather pattern that’s most efficient at ridding the Arctic of its increasingly fragile ice cover during the region’s summer melt season, it would look like what occurred earlier this summer — clear skies, above-average air temperatures, a high-pressure system across the Central Arctic, and an ongoing heat wave and wildfires in Siberia.

A recent study concluded that the unusual warmth in Siberia could not have happened in the absence of human-caused global warming.

Sea ice loss accelerated in early- to mid-July, bringing sea ice extent — which measures the area of ocean where there’s some ice cover, down to record-low levels for this time of the year.

As of Saturday, the Arctic as a region had an ice extent that was about 193,000 square miles below the previous record low for the date, using data from the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency.

In other words, the difference between the sea ice extent on July 18, 2020, and the previous record low for the same date is equivalent to the states of Colorado and Oklahoma combined.

[Image: Snap-2020-09-07-at-15-49-30.png]
LINK

Anyone who's been following this knows that 2012 was an anomalous year and scientist were predicting an ice free arctic right around the corner due to it... When it didn't happen warming deniers quickly pointed it out and called the scientist crazy fear mongers. Now a few short years later the Ice Melt for 2020 is trending well below 2012 and a Ice Free Summer Sea in the Arctic is a guarantee,,, wouldn't you know it, everybody is to worried about catching a cold to take notice.

Print this item