[Lordy x2]

So does this mean the vaccine doesn't work?

Asking for a friend

Dude, have you been under a rock this whole time?

I would like to offer you some evidence contrary to your belief in hopes you will see where you have been bamboozled as Dr. Sterling Williams likes to say. I would like you to read this with an open mind -

Vaccines have always been clearly defined under public health law and a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards. A vaccine specifically has to stimulate both the immunity within the person receiving it and also has to disrupt and block transmission.

Thus far, the CDC definition has been recently changed twice more since 2011.

- In 2011, the original Vaccination definition read, "Injection of a killed or weakened infectious organism in order to prevent the disease."

- On Aug 24th, they changed it to "a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to [produce immunity] to a specific disease.”

- On Sept 6th, they changed it yet again to "a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to [produce PROTECTION] to a specific disease.”

Keep in mind, naturally occurring viruses in the wild cannot be patented.

GMO (man-made) viruses can be patented.

Spike Protein Vaccine for Coronavirus Patented 22 Years Ago:

Up until 1999, coronavirus patents were all in the veterinary sciences. The first coronavirus vaccine to use the S spike protein was patented by Pfizer in January 2000 (Patent No. 6372224). It was a spike protein virus vaccine for canine coronavirus. You can look up the actual patents for yourself on the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s website if you like.

From HIV Vaccine Development to COVID-19:

Fauci and the NIAID “found the malleability of coronavirus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccines,” and in 1999, Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill (where Baric has a lab) to create “an infectious replication-defective coronavirus” specifically targeted for human lung epithelium.

The patent for that replication-defective coronavirus that attacks human lung cells was filed on April 19, 2002 (Patent No. 7279327). “In other words, we made SARS”. Several months after that patent filing, the SARS outbreak in Asia occurred.

Today:

(Moderna and Pfizer) have been abundantly clear in stating that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop the transmission, it is a gene therapy treatment. It is a medical device — not a drug — because it meets the CDRH [FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health] definition of a device. It is not a living system, it is not a biological system, it is a physical technology, it just happens to come in the size of a molecular package.

Please see this link for what determines is a biological weapon.

18 U.S. Code § 175 - Prohibitions with respect to biological weapons

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/175

This is a mechanical device (A clear Bio-Weapon by definition) in the form of a very small package of technology that is being inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogen manufacturing site. They are using the term “vaccine” to sneak this under public health exemptions.

”This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator.

To Add - It is a well-known fact there is gross under-reporting into VAERS.

Harvard did a 3 yr long study and found Significant Under-Reporting to VAERS. A 2011 report by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) stated that fewer than one percent of all vaccine adverse events are reported to the government. https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/01/o...-to-vaers/

0			0