[Lordy x2]

Where's the other foot?

Don't matter, the picture in and of itself is just more proof the Apollo Mission was fake. If you were in the dessert and were walking through sand you would leave foot prints but they would not be very well defined. Just an indent in the sand roughly the same shape and size as the bottom of your boot and its depth would be dependent on how fat your ass is. There would and could be no sign of the tread design on the bottom of your boot. The problem in the dessert is there is little moisture and mortar to hold the sand together for a well defined boot print. Mortar being organic in nature such as clay which is what is used in sand casting.

Sand is nothing other than the remnants of the erosion of its parent rock and its granular nature makes it impossible to lock together with itself and achieve well defined castings or prints. Not without adding the other mentioned constituents to it which the Moon is lacking. The only thing on the moon would be ground up parent rock minus water or mortar and the boot prints left in that strata wouldn't be anymore defined than boot prints left in dessert sand of Planet Earth.

Wait! BUT the sand seems to be ground up to the consistency of dust on the Moon wouldn't that make it more able to leave a defined boot print? Nope, just different size grains of sand without water or mortar will not make a well defined boot print.

If you think about it you have to wonder where did the dustified sand on the moon even come from? There is no wind or water to erode the parent rock. On Earth water rinsing down off of mountains grinds the parent rock to sand and caries it to the ocean and then storms and tidal action flings it up on the beaches. Not much of that happening on the Moon, so there you have it, the thought that there is anything to even leave a print in on the moon is unfathomable.

0			0